This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.X

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg claims that privacy settings would be public by default if he were to start the site now

Share this article:

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has said that if he were to create Facebook again, user information would be public by default.

In a live interview with TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington, Zuckerberg spends around a minute of the interview talking about the social networking site's privacy policies, which caused users to vent their fury over the changes that will allow them and their details to be visible from web searches.

He claimed that when he was in his dorm room at Harvard, he was asked why he would want to put any information on the internet at all and why would he want to have a website?

Zuckerberg said: “In the last five or six years, blogging has taken off in a huge way and all these different services that have people sharing all this information. People have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people. That social norm is just something that has evolved over time.

“We view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating and updating what our system is to reflect what the current social norms are.”

Referring directly to the privacy changes, he said that he ‘viewed that as a really important thing, to always keep a beginner's mind and think, what would we do if we were starting the company now and we decided that these would be the social norms now and we just went for it'?

However in an open letter, Craig Kanalley of the Huffington Post claimed that Zuckerberg was ‘moving Facebook in a direction that worries me. You're not listening to your core users, to your base'.

Referring to the privacy changes, he said: “These aren't tools we need. These are tools to spread our personal data to more and more people than ever before, and to make it easier for advertisers to target us. These abrupt changes were a clear act of aggression against your entire user base. And I can assure you that you'll lose users, including myself, if you continue down this path.

“Because here's the thing, Mark. Behind all those numbers, and behind the dollar signs that may be in the back of your mind, there are people. Real people. Human beings. With lives. And friends. And family. And employers. And they're all connected on Facebook. And if the wrong piece of information gets to the wrong person, or if a private detail gets to a marketing company, or if criminals or stalkers find info they need to attack people, you will ruin people's lives.”

Kanalley also claimed that being ‘open' makes sense for Google and Twitter, but for a place stashed with private information, such as Facebook, it should not be the trend.

“You're a site that stores the most private of data, so be careful. Don't mess with people's lives. For Facebook, ‘open' is not the way to go,” he said.

Share this article:

SC webcasts on demand

This is how to secure data in the cloud


Exclusive video webcast & Q&A sponsored by Vormetric


As enterprises look to take advantage of the cloud, they need to understand the importance of safeguarding their confidential and sensitive data in cloud environments. With the appropriate security safeguards, such as fine-grained access policies, a move to the cloud is as, or more, secure than an on-premise data storage.


View the webcast here to find out more

More in News

Defending Critical Infrastructure: only 6% of incidents malicious

Defending Critical Infrastructure: only 6% of incidents malicious

The weather, or even simple mis-configuration, are threats to critical infrastructure, but in an emergency, could government now run privatised utilities?

Scammers tap the power of Facebook to offer `free' iPhones a-plenty

Scammers tap the power of Facebook to offer ...

Free iPhone? More like an iPhoney...

FBI's facial and fingerprint super-database goes live

FBI's facial and fingerprint super-database goes live

The FBI: we have your facial and fingerprint templates on file...