ICO disputes Freedom of Information Act findings on cookie reporting
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has dismissed claims that it is unprepared when it comes to investigating cookie compliance failures.
As detailed by SC Magazine, a Freedom of Information (FoI) request submitted by PC Pro found that 320 websites have been reported to the ICO through its online submission tool, but none of those sites have been investigated.
However in a statement sent to SC Magazine, the ICO claimed that the suggestions were "dramatically wide of the mark".
It said: “The reality is that the ICO has been working to ensure compliance with the cookie law since it was introduced, with enforcement work complementing an education programme and significant liaison with the industry.”
The ICO said that after the 12-month grace period it gave companies to comply with the law ended in May 2012, its enforcement team wrote to 75 of the most visited websites, asking what steps they had taken to achieve compliance and its recently-established intelligence hub is monitoring the 75 websites contacted.
“So far 45 have been analysed, of which 27 have clearly taken action to increase the visibility of the information about cookies. Only three sites make no specific mention of cookies on their home page, and these, along with the six sites that failed to respond to our letter, will be set a deadline to take steps towards compliance, with formal enforcement action likely for the organisations that fail to meet this deadline,” it said.
The ICO also said that it has reviewed the 331 responses collected from its online cookie concern reporting tool, and its next step is to write to all of the websites highlighted.
It said: “It should be noted that a significant number of the responses do not provide any intelligence that can be analysed, while a proportion also highlight websites that rely on implied consent, which is in line with the EU law.
“A progress update, including a list of all the websites contacted, will be published on our website in November, six months after the cookie concern reporting tool was established.”