The plan addresses legal and policy reform and corporate due diligence, and more specifically, recommends that surveillance should only occur when it's targeted, based on evidence of wrongdoing and authorised by an unbiased authority figure, such as a judge.
All surveillance powers should also be overseen by unbiased parliamentary and judicial powers, the group wrote, and there should be equal privacy protections for nationals and non-nationals, those within the borders of a state and outside of it.
Furthermore, governments shouldn't make encryption or anonymisation technologies illegal, Amnesty wrote. These suggestions follow a recent United Nations report that said imposing limitations on default encryption hinders access to human rights.
Amnesty's plan also advocated strong legal protection of whistleblowers who disclosed public interest information, including information on human rights violations.
Former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden released his own opinion piece on Friday, as well, to reflect on the past two years in government surveillance, or since the initial release of his document cache.
“We are witnessing the emergence of a post-terror generation, one that rejects a worldview defined by a singular tragedy,” he wrote. “For the first time since the attacks of September 11, 2001, we see the outline of a politics that turns away from reaction and fear in favor of resilience and reason. With each court victory, with every change in the law, we demonstrate facts are more convincing than fear.”
He also pointed to Apple as upping the privacy ante by enabling default encryption on its new operating system.
“Such structural technological changes can ensure access to basic privacies beyond borders, insulating ordinary citizens from the arbitrary passage of anti-privacy laws, such as those now descending upon Russia,” he said.